New HPV information You Need to Know

The first mandatory vaccination law was passed by the British Parliament in 1853. The law required universal, mandatory vaccination for all infants to "protect children from their negligent parents." By passing laws, the service could be regulated by the states and the administration of a vaccine could be restricted exclusively to medical doctors.

In this LIVE, one-hour presentation you will learn:

• Why doctors are so committed to mandatory vaccination
• How the Alternative Medicine became linked to resistance to vaccination
• Detailed information about problems associated with Gardasil, the cervical cancer vaccine recommended for 9 year old girls
• Why all new vaccines become recommendations for young children
• The shocking number of vaccines now injected into children before entering school
• Tips for keeping a healthy cervix without vaccines.

This powerful presentation will give you the information you need to resist the vaccination of all young girls with a vaccine that has questionable efficacy and a marginal safety profile.
Available as an audio CD and as a DVD, this information was recorded LIVE at The Chicago Health Freedom Expo in June, 2007. Phone orders only until next week (then through website)! 440-239-1878.....price is only $24.95

Pass this information on to your friends! Please post and pass on! Thanks in advance for your financial support for additional vaccine products to support your decisions about vaccination.

Flu Shot Proven To Be Ineffective....Again.

In quick succession, the view that influenza shots yield life-saving benefits for elderly people has come under serious attack and received fresh support in recent weeks.

One group of experts, writing in the October issue of Lancet Infectious Diseases, argued that the mortality benefits of flu shots for the elderly have been greatly exaggerated because of a subtle bias and other methodologic problems in many of the relevant studies. "The remaining evidence base is currently insufficient to indicate the magnitude of the mortality benefit, if any, that elderly people derive from the vaccination programme," says the analysis by Lone Simonsen, PhD, of George Washington University in Washington, DC, and colleagues

Offering a sharp critique of the evidence, the authors of the study offered several reasons for questioning the notion that flu immunization saves lives in the elderly population:

1. Even thought vaccination coverage among the elderly has increased from 15% to 65% since 1980, the overall mortality due to pneumonia and influenza in elderly people has increased in that period.

2. Few randomized, placebo-controlled trials have examined flu vaccine effectiveness in elderly people. The largest and best study, done in the Netherlands, showed a 50% reduction in confirmed flu cases among all the volunteers, but the reduction for those older than 70 was only 23%. There was no significant reduction in influenza-like illness.

3. A number of investigators have reported finding evidence of flu vaccination benefits in the elderly by analyzing the records of large healthcare organizations. But these studies typically are flawed in that investigators looked for an effect on all-cause mortality, a nonspecific outcome, rather than on lab-confirmed flu.

4, Further, many such studies may be marred by a subtle selection bias, wherein relatively healthy older people were more likely to be vaccinated, thereby making vaccination look more beneficial than it really was. A further problem is that cohort studies typically have defined the flu season arbitrarily as December through March, rather than on the basis of flu surveillance.

COMMENT: In 2005, the Cochrane Collaboration reviewed studies that involved nearly 500,000 people and concluded that the vaccine was "no better than placebo" in all three age groups for which the shot is advocated: babies, middle aged adults and the elderly. I discussed this in detail in my book, FOWL!

How many more studies will it take to prove the flu shot doesn't work and there are better ways to stay healthy in the winter?

Vaccines and Money--Full Steam Ahead for Gardasil

Recent reports of episodes of Guillain-Barré syndrome, or GBS, following administration of Gardasil, the vaccine for cervical cancer, have led the Centers for Disease Control to investigate whether a connection exists between the two events.

According to CDC documents, initial findings indicate that six of the 13 reports occurred after Gardasil was given alone; two reports met the "strict case definition" of GBS, occurring within six weeks after vaccination and occurred in patients who had received Gardasil alone. Six of the 13 reports involved simultaneous administration of Gardasil and Menactra, the college meningitis vaccine. Seven deaths among individuals who had received Gardacil are "being investigated."

COMMENT: Despite of reports of injury and death in young girls, the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics and pro-vaccine pundits charge full steam ahead to jab young girls with a dangerous drug with unproven effectiveness.

What was the CDC's response to the reports of GBS after the vaccine? "The overall number of reports of GBS is consistent with what would be expected to occur by chance after a vaccination." If there is even a chance that this vaccine is killing 9-year-old girls, it should be stopped until it is proven to be non-lethal. Problem is, they won't be able to know how deadly it is until the vaccine has been used for a few more years....and a many more deaths and injuries have occurred.

The holy of holies to the Medical Establishment, a syringe full of viruses and chemicals, will be honored and promoted regardless of the amount of harm inflicted on individuals, on families and on society as a whole. If government agencies were truly looking out for our best interest, statistics would dictate at least an occasional agreement with scientific evidence and first-hand reports of parents. The complete support of vaccines and bias toward research funded by drug companies to support vaccination makes one wonder how completely out of touch -- or bought off -- these fellow humans really are.

But parents are smart and are learning quickly to stand up for themselves. They are refusing vaccines and questioning the motives behind jealous vaccinators. Money motives have always been suspected. I recently discovered a presentation by the NVAC Vaccine Finance Working Group delivered September 26, 2006 that clearly describes the money motive behind vaccination. One of the goals of the NVAC meeting, the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, was to "Obtain input from stakeholders on the challenges in creating optimal approaches to vaccine financing in both the public and private sectors, and their impact on access." The aim was to find ways to secure more funding from the government to be sure that all children were vaccinated. (government = your tax dollars.)

Slide 19 of the presentation provided this insightful information:
THE TRUE COST OF VACCINES
• Purchase price of the vaccine.
• Personnel costs for ordering and inventory.
• Storage costs since the vaccines must be stored in a refrigerator or freezer, which is depreciated.
•Possible re-vaccination costs due to problems with storage.
•Insurance to insure against loss.
•A 5% estimated wastage/non-payment due to office collection rates, HMO discounts, bad debt, etc.
•Large sums tied up in vaccine inventory -- e.g. 10 member pediatric group had $100,000 in vaccine inventory in 2005. [NOTE: That dollar estimate was before having to purchase expensive Gardasil and Menactra, beginning in 2006.--ST]

Your pediatrician or his boss (the Hospital System) as to put out real dollars and big bucks to acquire vaccines for patients. That money has be be recouped. In addition, vaccines have expiration dates -- especially the flu shots, good for only a short period of time. Many doctors who work for HMOs are on revenue quotas, meaning, theyare required to generate a certain amount of money each quarter to recieve a bonus and in some cases, to remain employed.

The primary way most pediatricians generate revenue is through office and hospital visits and giving vaccines, high ticket products dispensed from their office. At $120 per dose, Gardasil is the fastest way to money make revenue quotas. And if the vaccine makes the child sick...that generates more office visits. And if Gardasil injuries generate more hospital stays...that generates more visits and more revenues.

Yes, doctoring is about taking care of people and many pediatricians truly adore their little patients. But rest assured, doctoring is also about generating fees and making money. That's not a "bad thing;" it is simply a reality of how doctors earn a living. But is giving more than 100 vaccines through about 37 shots and at least 7 office visits before a child can enter kindergarten really necessary, or is it mostly about money?